ECONOMIC UNCERTAINTY AND AUDITORS’ PROFESSIONAL SKEPTICISM: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY AMIDST GLOBAL VOLATILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56127/ijme.v4i2.2160Keywords:
Economic uncertainty, professional skepticism, self-efficacy, client pressure, behavioral auditing, audit qualityAbstract
In times of economic instability, auditors face increasing challenges in maintaining professional judgment and audit quality. This study investigates the relationship between perceived economic uncertainty and auditors’ professional skepticism, while also examining the moderating role of self-efficacy and the mediating role of client pressure. Using a quantitative approach, survey data were collected from 100 external auditors across public accounting firms in Indonesia. The results of regression analysis reveal that higher perceived economic uncertainty significantly reduces the level of professional skepticism. Additionally, client pressure was found to negatively impact skepticism, while self-efficacy exhibited a strong positive effect, acting as a buffer against external pressures. These findings suggest that both environmental and individual-level factors influence auditor behavior during uncertain economic conditions. This study contributes to the behavioral auditing literature by incorporating macroeconomic perceptions into the audit judgment framework and offers practical implications for audit firms and regulators to strengthen auditor resilience and objectivity under pressure.
References
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Harding, N., & Trotman, K. T. (2017). The influence of portfolio case misstatement risk and experience on auditors’ risk judgments and planning decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 58, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2017.03.002
Hurtt, R. K., Brown-Liburd, H. L., Earley, C. E., & Krishnamoorthy, G. (2013). Research on auditor professional skepticism: Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(Supplement 1), 45–97. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50361
International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2021). International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 200: Overall objectives of the independent auditor and the conduct of an audit in accordance with international standards on auditing. https://www.iaasb.org
International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants. (2020). Handbook of the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants. International Federation of Accountants. https://www.ethicsboard.org
Nelson, M. W. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2009.28.2.1
Shafer, W. E., Morris, R. E., & Ketchand, A. A. (2001). Effects of personal values on auditors' ethical decisions. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14(3), 254–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005517
Shaub, M. K., & Lawrence, J. E. (1996). Ethics, experience, and professional skepticism: A situational analysis. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8, 124–157.
Tang, G., Karim, K., & Luo, Y. (2021). Artificial intelligence in auditing: A review and research agenda. Journal of International Accounting Research, 20(3), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.2308/JIAR-2021-008
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tommy Kuncara, Rini Dwiastutiningsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
