CLIMATE CHANGE AND GREEN FISCAL POLICY: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON ENVIRONMENTAL TAXATION AND SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC GROWTH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56127/jekma.v4i2.2085Keywords:
Green Fiscal Policy, Environmental Taxation, Carbon Pricing, Sustainable Economic GrowthAbstract
This paper presents a systematic literature review on the intersection between climate change mitigation and green fiscal policy, with a specific focus on environmental taxation and its role in promoting sustainable economic growth. In response to the escalating climate crisis, governments worldwide are adopting fiscal instruments such as carbon taxes, pollution levies, and green subsidies to internalize environmental externalities and shift market behavior. This review synthesizes findings from 40 peer-reviewed articles and policy reports published between 2010 and 2024, examining both theoretical and empirical perspectives.
The review identifies three major themes: (1) the effectiveness of carbon pricing in reducing emissions, (2) the role of fiscal incentives in accelerating green technology adoption, and (3) the distributional impacts and political economy challenges of implementing green tax reforms. Results show that while carbon taxation can reduce emissions by up to 20% in certain jurisdictions, its success is highly context-dependent, shaped by institutional strength, public trust, and economic structure.
The study concludes that green fiscal policy is a powerful but complex tool that requires careful design to balance environmental goals with equity and economic competitiveness. It also highlights research gaps, particularly in low-income countries, and calls for more interdisciplinary approaches in evaluating long-term outcomes. This review contributes to the growing discourse on climate-responsive public finance and provides policy insights for designing effective, equitable, and growth-oriented environmental tax regimes.
References
Barbier, E. B. (2016). Building the green economy. Canadian Public Policy, 42(1), S1–S10.
Bowen, A., & Hepburn, C. (2014). Prospects for green growth. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30(3), 303–321.
Carl, J., & Fedor, D. (2016). Tracking global carbon revenues: A survey of carbon taxes and ETS. Climate Policy, 16(6), 703–726.
Carattini, S., Baranzini, A., Thalmann, P., Varone, F., & Vöhringer, F. (2017). Green taxes in a post-Paris world: Are millions of nays inevitable? Environmental and Resource Economics, 68, 97–128.
Fullerton, D., & Metcalf, G. E. (2001). Environmental controls, scarcity rents, and pre-existing distortions. Journal of Public Economics, 80(2), 249–267.
Goulder, L. H., & Hafstead, M. A. (2018). Confronting the climate challenge: US policy options. Columbia University Press.
Jacobs, M. (2013). Green growth: Economic theory and political discourse. In R. Fouquet (Ed.), Handbook on energy and climate change (pp. 197–213). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Klenert, D., Mattauch, L., Combet, E., Edenhofer, O., Hepburn, C., Rafaty, R., & Stern, N. (2018). Making carbon pricing work for citizens. Nature Climate Change, 8(8), 669–677.
Loiseau, E., Saikku, L., Antikainen, R., Droste, N., Hansjürgens, B., Pitkänen, K., ... & Thomsen, M. (2016). Green economy and related concepts: An overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 361–371.
McKinsey & Company. (2020). How a post-pandemic stimulus can both create jobs and help the climate. https://www.mckinsey.com/
OECD. (2015). Aligning policies for a low-carbon economy. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264233294-en
Rydge, J., Martin, R., & Valero, A. (2018). UK industrial policy and the green economy: A framework for analysis. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
UNDP. (2021). Green economy and sustainable development: Investing in the future we want. United Nations Development Programme. https://www.undp.org/
Yeo, S., & Chang, Y. (2017). Renewable energy and political will: The case of East and Southeast Asia. Energy Policy, 107, 389–401.
Zhang, B., & Liu, B. (2020). Emission trading system in China: Progress and challenges. Energy Economics, 91, 104848.
