Pengaruh Sarana Prasarana Pembelajaran dan Motivasi Mengajar terhadap Efektivitas Kinerja Guru Sekolah Menengah Atas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56127/jushpen.v5i1.2809Keywords:
Learning Facilities and Infrastructure, Teaching Motivation, Teacher Performance Effectiveness, Teacher PerformanceAbstract
This study aims to examine the influence of learning facilities and infrastructure as well as teaching motivation on teacher performance effectiveness. The research employed a survey method. The participants consisted of 80 respondents who were randomly selected from SMA Negeri 7 Tambun, Bekasi. Data were collected using a questionnaire based on a Likert scale. The validity and reliability tests confirmed that the research instrument was valid and reliable, while the normality test indicated that all data were normally distributed. The findings reveal that learning facilities and infrastructure have a significant effect on teacher performance effectiveness. Likewise, teaching motivation has a significant effect on teacher performance effectiveness. The coefficient of determination (R²) indicates that learning facilities and infrastructure, together with teaching motivation, have a strong relationship in explaining teacher performance effectiveness. These findings suggest that improving educational facilities and fostering teachers’ motivation can contribute to enhancing the effectiveness of teacher performance in the learning process.
References
Davies, K. I. (1991). Instructional technique. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Gagne, R. M. (1977). The conditions of learning (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2001). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. PT Gunung Agung.
Lamatenggo, N., Ansar, A., Arwildayanto, A., & Sumar, W. T. (2023). The role of teachers’ teaching performance in Bolangitang Barat elementary school: Competency, motivation, and teacher-training education. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(4), 5408–5417. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.4473
Lestari, A. (2015). [Lengkapi sesuai sumber asli yang digunakan dalam penelitian].
Marini, A. (2015). Manajemen sekolah dasar. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mathis, R. L., & Jackson, J. H. (2002). Human resource management (10th ed.). South-Western College Publishing.
McGaugh, J. L. (1977). Psychology: An experimental approach. W. H. Freeman and Company.
Muflihan, Y., Prasetyaningtyas, W., Fajri, N., & Sari, N. (2024). Meta-analysis study: The influence of motivation on teacher performance in Indonesia. Formosa Journal of Science and Technology, 3(2), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.55927/fjst.v3i2.8143
Nasir, M. (1997). Metodologi penelitian. Ghalia Indonesia.
Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 24 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Sarana dan Prasarana untuk Sekolah Dasar/Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (SD/MI), Sekolah Menengah Pertama/Madrasah Tsanawiyah (SMP/MTs), dan Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah (SMA/MA). (2007). Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia.
Rapi. (2016). [Lengkapi judul, penerbit, atau sumber asli yang digunakan dalam sitasi Suparno dikutip Rapi (2016)].
Sardiman. (2004). Interaksi dan motivasi belajar mengajar. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Slameto. (1991). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Rineka Cipta.
Stoner, J. A. F., & Freeman, R. E. (1989). Management (4th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Suradinata, E. (1996). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Ramadhan.
Sutisna, O. (2000). Administrasi pendidikan: Dasar teoretis untuk praktik profesional. Angkasa.
Taufan, M. Y. (2022). Professional development of teachers, competencies, educational facilities and infrastructure on teacher performance and learning achievement of high school students in Makassar City. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 2(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v2i1.168
Thoha, M. (2000). Kepemimpinan dalam manajemen. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
