CSR EXPENDITURE AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF SLACK RESOURCES AS A MODERATING VARIABLE THROUGH THE LENS OF AGENCY THEORY AND SLACK RESOURCE THEORY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56127/ijme.v5i2.2796Keywords:
Corporate Social Responsibility, CSR Expenditure, Financial Performance, Organizational Slack, Agency Theory, Slack Resource Theory, Moderating Variable, Systematic ReviewAbstract
The question of whether corporate social responsibility (CSR) expenditure helps or hurts firm financial performance has generated decades of research without producing a settled answer. This systematic narrative review examines 50 peer-reviewed studies published between 1963 and 2026, with an emphasis on Scopus-indexed empirical work from 2020 onward, to map what the literature shows about this relationship and why the evidence points in so many directions. Two theoretical frameworks organise the analysis: agency theory (Jensen & Meckling, 1976) and slack resource theory (Bourgeois, 1981). The review finds that the CSR-financial performance relationship is positive on average but conditional in important ways. Unabsorbed slack, meaning liquid discretionary resources, consistently strengthens the positive relationship because it allows firms to fund CSR without reducing operational efficiency and because markets read such investment as a credible signal of financial health. Absorbed slack, by contrast, shows a non-linear pattern: modest levels appear to support CSR-linked performance gains, while high levels tend to invite the managerial opportunism that agency theory predicts. Governance quality emerges as the factor that determines which of these two forces wins out. Five research gaps are identified, covering measurement standardisation, the distinction between mandatory and voluntary CSR, causal identification, optimal slack thresholds, and the shortage of evidence from developing economies outside China.
References
Abdeen, A., Tariq, M., & Khan, S. (2022). Abnormal CSR and financial performance. European Accounting Review, 32(3), 745–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2022.2084134
Akhter, F., & Hassan, M. K. (2022). The impact of corporate governance on CSR and financial performance: Evidence from BRICS economies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1535–1550. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2586
Al-Hiyari, A., Ismail, A. I., & Kolsi, M. F. (2022). ESG disclosure and investment efficiency in emerging markets. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 22(7), 1451–1475. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-03-2022-0133
Amba-Rao, S., & Pattanayak, J. K. (2022). The role of slack resources in explaining the relationship between corporate social responsibility disclosure and firm market value: A case from an emerging market. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Investment, 14(2), 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2022.2119833
Amir, M., Iqbal, N., & Tahir, S. (2022). Impact of corporate environmental responsibility on firm’s financial performance: Moderating role of organizational slack and industry competition. Sukkur IBA Journal of Management and Business, 8(2), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.30537/sijmb.v8i2.603
Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0496-z
Benlemlih, M., & Bitar, M. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and investment efficiency. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(3), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3020-2
Bourgeois, L. J. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1981.4287985
Chairani, C., & Siregar, S. V. (2021). The effect of enterprise risk management on financial performance and firm value: Moderating role of environmental, social and governance performance. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(3), 647–670. https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-09-2019-0549
Chung, C. Y., Bayne, L., & Birt, J. (2023). ESG disclosure under mandatory and voluntary regimes: Evidence from Hong Kong. Asian Review of Accounting, 31(3), 420–446. https://doi.org/10.1108/ara-07-2022-0165
Chung, R., Bayne, L., & Birt, J. (2023). The impact of environmental, social and governance ( ESG ) disclosure on firm financial performance : evidence from Hong Kong. Asian Review of Accounting, November 2021. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-07-2022-0165
Cicchiello, A. F., Marrazza, F., & Perdichizzi, S. (2022). Non-financial disclosure regulation and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance: The case of EU and US firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1121–1136. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2408
Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Dela, E., Ye, J., & Berhe, H. M. (2024). The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance in Indonesian highly polluted industries: Mediating role of industry competitiveness. SAGE Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241259479
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.
Garcia-Sanchez, I. M., Martinez-Ferrero, J., & Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B. (2023). Tradeoff between corporate investment and CSR: The moderating effect of financial slack, workforce slack, and board gender diversity. International Review of Financial Analysis, 87, 102621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102621
Gholami, A., Murray, P. A., & Sands, J. (2022). ESG and the financial performance of large Australian firms. Sustainability, 14(10), 6019. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106019
Guerrero-Villegas, J., Perez-Calero, L., Hurtado-Gonzalez, J. M., & Giraldez-Puig, P. (2024). Governing the responsible investment of slack resources in ESG performance: How beneficial are CSR committees? Journal of Business Ethics, 192(3), 587–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05798-6
Guo, Z., Hou, S., & Li, Q. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and firm value: The moderating effects of financial flexibility and R&D investment. Sustainability, 12(20), 8452. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208452
Islam, M. R., Ghosh, R., & Khatun, M. (2021). Do organizational slack, free cash flow, and firm profitability affect corporate social expenditure? Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 11(3), 406–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-09-2020-0248
Islam, S., Ghosh, R., & Khatun, A. (2021). Slack resources , free cash flow and corporate social responsibility expenditure : evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 11(4), 533–551. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-09-2020-0248
Jensen. (1986). Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow , Corporate Finance , and Takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329. https://doi.org/http:// dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.99580
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jiao, L., Liu, Z., & Xu, N. (2021). Organizational slack and green practices: The moderating role of slack resources on corporate environmental performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(5), 1536–1550. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2220
Kim, E., Ok, C., & Kang, M. (2020). Does organizational slack facilitate strategic flexibility? The roles of unabsorbed slack and absorbed slack. Human Resource Management, 59(5), 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22030
Kim, M., Mun, S., & Han, J. (2022). CEO-shareholder alignment and corporate social responsibility overinvestment. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1360–1374. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2384
Kong, Y., Antwi-Adjei, A., Baffour-Awuah, E., & Gyimah, P. (2023). ESG performance and technological innovation in developing countries. Sustainability, 15(19), 14240. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914240
Lee, C., & Isa, C. R. (2022). ESG practices and financial performance of Shariah-compliant firms in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 13(4), 641–660. https://doi.org/10.1108/jiabr-06-2020-0183
Lee, S., Liu, Y., & Yu, G. (2020). Organizational slack and environmental management: Examining the interaction between top management team characteristics and firm resources. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2139–2153. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2042
Li, R. (2021). Corporate governance and organisational slack in times of crisis: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(6), 1087–1103. https://doi.org/10.1108/cg-09-2020-0401
Li, Z., Liao, G., & Albitar, K. (2019). Does corporate environmental responsibility engagement affect firm value? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1045–1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2416
Maji, S. G., & Lohia, P. (2022). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance and firm performance in India. Society and Business Review, 18(1), 175–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-06-2022-0162
Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2009). Does it pay to be good and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Harvard Business School.
Mattingly, J. E., & Olsen, L. (2018). Performance outcomes of investing slack resources in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 26(1), 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818762336
Mazumdar, S. (2025). Corporate social responsibility expenditure and financial performance: The case of optional spending and mandatory reporting in India. Global Business and Organizational Excellence. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22291
Mooneeapen, O., Abhayawansa, S., & Khan, M. N. A. A. (2022). The influence of the country governance environment on environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(4), 953–985. https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-07-2021-0298
Neves, M. E., Santos, M., & Proenca, C. (2021). The impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance: An analysis of Portuguese companies. EuroMed Journal of Business, 16(3), 280–300. https://doi.org/10.1108/emjb-04-2021-0055
Onuoha, B. C. (2021). Slack resources and CSR link: Evidence from manufacturing firms in Nigeria. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Business, 4(2), 1–13. https://jurnal.unpad.ac.id/jaab/article/view/33284
Oware, K. M., & Mallikarjunappa, T. (2021). CSR expenditure, mandatory CSR reporting and financial performance of listed firms in India: An institutional theory perspective. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(2), 390–416. https://doi.org/10.1108/medar-05-2020-0896
Rau, P., Reyes Flores, D., & Simha, A. (2020). Organizational slack and firm performance: The role of slack bundles. Management Decision, 58(12), 2619–2638. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-02-2020-0171
Saeidi, S. P., Sofian, S., Saeidi, P., Saeidi, S. P., & Saaeidi, S. A. (2015). How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research, 68(2), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.028
Shaikh, I. (2022). Impact of ESG on investment decisions: International evidence. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 23(3), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2022.16202
Shakil, M. H. (2020). Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(3), e2271. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2574
Sheikh, S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and payout policy. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 17(4), 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmf-09-2020-0465
Vo, T. T., Nguyen, T., & Tran, H. (2026). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance in emerging markets: A systematic review to enhance decision-making frameworks. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 11, 100987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.100987
Wang, Q., Dou, J., & Jia, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors. Business and Society, 55(8), 1083–1121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315584317
Wasiuzzaman, S., Uyar, A., & Kuzey, C. (2021). Corporate social responsibility: Is it a matter of slack financial resources or strategy or both? Managerial and Decision Economics, 43(6), 2444–2466. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3537
Wu, H., Li, S., Ying, S. X., & Chen, X. (2022). How does the absorbed slack impact corporate social responsibility? Exploring the nonlinear effect and condition in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 824552. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.824552
Xiao, S., Xu, J., & Li, R. (2024). Are digital trends driving corporate environmental, social, and governance practices? Evidence from China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(6), 5366–5385. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3756
Xie, X. (2022). Can organizational slack drive green innovation? The moderating role of unabsorbed slack. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 949146. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.949146
Yoo, J. A., Lee, J. H., & Kim, J. (2021). Financial slack and firm performance: Exploring the moderating effects of organizational factors. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 32(3), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21449
Zheng, J., Li, S., & Wu, B. (2021). Organizational slack and firm performance in tourism: A meta-analytic investigation of moderating effects. Journal of Travel Research, 61(5), 1050–1067. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472875211014956
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ika Prayanthi, Danny Rantung, Nouke Rantung
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
