Language Processing in EFL Learners: A Psycholinguistic Study of Lexical Access and Sentence Comprehension

Authors

  • Zahwa Nazhifah Limbeng Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Khairun Nisa Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Faris Fadillah Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Yani Lubis Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56127/ijml.v5i1.2498

Keywords:

psycholinguistics, EFL learners, lexical access, sentence comprehension, language processing

Abstract

This study investigates language processing in EFL learners from a psycholinguistic perspective, with a focus on lexical access and sentence comprehension. Many EFL learners experience persistent comprehension difficulties despite years of formal instruction. This study aims to explain these difficulties by examining underlying cognitive processes rather than surface-level performance. The research employed a qualitative design involving undergraduate EFL students. Data were collected through think-aloud protocols, semi-structured interviews, reading comprehension tasks, and field notes. The analysis applied thematic procedures to identify patterns related to word retrieval, processing strategies, and sentence parsing. The findings reveal five dominant issues: delayed lexical access, reliance on word-by-word processing, difficulty with complex sentence structures, heavy dependence on first-language translation, and low automaticity in language processing. These factors interacted to increase cognitive load and disrupt real-time comprehension. The results indicate that comprehension failure stems primarily from processing constraints rather than insufficient grammatical knowledge. The study highlights the importance of incorporating psycholinguistic principles into EFL instruction. Teaching practices should prioritize processing efficiency, repeated exposure, and incremental sentence comprehension. By aligning pedagogy with how learners process language cognitively, EFL instruction can become more effective and sustainable.

References

Barcroft, J. (2015). Lexical input processing and vocabulary learning.

Dóczi, B. (2019). An overview of conceptual models and theories of lexical representation in the mental lexicon. The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies, 46-65.

Hein, K., & Kauschke, C. (2020). Word form processing in primary school children: A psycholinguistic perspective. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(11), 3685-3699.

Krishna, K. S., Madhavi, P. A., & Srilatha, M. (2024). Exploring Psycholinguistic Phenomena in the Acquisition of the English Language: An Investigation for Pedagogical Enhancement. Library of Progress-Library Science, Information Technology & Computer, 44(2).

Marcelino, M. E. (2024). Psycholinguistics: How Language Shapes Cognition. Berkeley Undergraduate Journal, 38(1).

Miroshnychenko, I. (2024). TECHNICAL VOCABULARY IN FOREIGN LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: SEEKING EFFECTIVE METHODS FOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. Collection of scientific papers «ΛΌГOΣ», (May 24, 2024; Zurich, Switzerland), 259-266.

Nowbakht, M. (2019). The role of working memory, language proficiency, and learners’ age in second language English learners’ processing and comprehension of anaphoric sentences. Journal of psycholinguistic research, 48(2), 353-370.

Pienemann, M. (2003). Language processing capacity. The handbook of second language acquisition, 679-714.

Privalova, I. V. (2021). Methods of psycholinguistic research as possible cognitive approaches to linguistic data processing. In Multimodality, Digitalization and Cognitivity in Communication and Pedagogy (pp. 181-201). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Safdari, M., & Fathi, J. (2020). Investigating the role of dynamic assessment on speaking accuracy and fluency of pre-intermediate EFL learners. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1818924.

Spitzer, D. A. (2023). Comprehensible Input for Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition (Doctoral dissertation, Northcentral University).

Downloads

Published

2026-01-19