Speech Production in EFL Classrooms: A Psycholinguistic Study of Planning and Fluency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56127/ijml.v5i1.2501Keywords:
psycholinguistics, speech production, EFL learners, planning, fluencyAbstract
This study investigates speech production in EFL classrooms from a psycholinguistic perspective, with a focus on planning and fluency. Many EFL learners experience difficulty speaking fluently even when they possess adequate grammatical and lexical knowledge. This study aims to explain these difficulties by examining the cognitive processes involved in real-time speech production. A qualitative research design was employed involving undergraduate EFL students. Data were collected through classroom speaking tasks, audio recordings, semi-structured interviews, stimulated recall sessions, and field notes. The analysis focused on patterns of speech planning, lexical retrieval, monitoring behavior, and fluency disruption. The findings reveal that excessive planning, slow lexical access, strong focus on form, and low automaticity significantly reduce fluency. Learners often plan and monitor their speech simultaneously, which increases cognitive load and leads to frequent pauses, hesitation, and self-repair. The results indicate that fluency problems stem primarily from processing constraints rather than lack of language knowledge. This study highlights the importance of incorporating psycholinguistic principles into EFL speaking instruction. Teaching practices should address planning load, reduce over-monitoring, and support the development of automaticity to improve spoken fluency.
References
Alshahrani, A., & Saud, W. (2024). The effectiveness of implementing task-based language teaching in Saudi secondary schools to improve students' oral fluency. Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices, 6(3), 76-91.
Alvarez, C. L., Tamayo, M. R., & Coutinho dos Santos, J. (2024). Factors influencing the development of speaking skills among Ecuadorian EFL learners: Teachers’ perspectives. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 319-331.
Dayat, D. (2017). Analysis on English speaking performance: Exploring students’ errors and the causes. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 71-74.
Hanifa, R. (2018). Factors generating anxiety when learning EFL speaking skills. Studies in English Language and Education, 5(2), 230-239.
Johnson, M. D., & Abdi Tabari, M. (2022). Task planning and oral L2 production: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 43(6), 1143-1164.
Lambert, C., Aubrey, S., & Leeming, P. (2021). Task preparation and second language speech production. Tesol Quarterly, 55(2), 331-365.
Lukačević, K. (2023). From Thought to Speech: An Overview of Language Production from a Psycholinguistic Perspective.
Tavakoli, P., & Wright, C. (2020). Second language speech fluency: From research to practice. Cambridge University Press.
Yu, Y. (2022). The role of psycholinguistics for language learning in teaching based on formulaic sequence use and oral fluency. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1012225.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Faisal Hajmi, Natasya Miranda Gihar, Laila Anum, Yani Lubis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












