The Role of Working Memory in Shaping EFL Learners’ Sentence Complexity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56127/ijml.v5i1.2505Keywords:
Working Memory, Sentence Complexity, EFL Leraners, PsycholinguisticsAbstract
Sentence complexity is widely regarded as an indicator of second language proficiency, yet many EFL learners struggle to produce structurally complex sentences despite having adequate grammatical knowledge. This study investigates the role of working memory in shaping EFL learners’ sentence complexity from a psycholinguistic perspective. Rather than treating sentence complexity as a purely linguistic outcome, the study examines it as a product of cognitive capacity during language production. Using a qualitative design, the study involved ten undergraduate EFL learners who completed sentence production tasks followed by stimulated recall interviews. The production data were analyzed to identify patterns of sentence complexity, while the interview data were used to explore learners’ cognitive experiences during sentence construction. The findings reveal that working memory strongly constrains learners’ ability to produce complex sentences. When cognitive load increased, learners consistently simplified sentence structure by reducing clause embedding and sentence length. Learners reported difficulty maintaining multiple linguistic elements simultaneously, particularly when lexical retrieval and grammatical organization competed for limited working memory resources. As a result, learners often prioritized meaning clarity and sentence completion over structural complexity. The study also shows that learners were aware of their working memory limitations and consciously adjusted sentence structure to manage cognitive demands. These findings support resource-limited models of language production and highlight working memory as a key factor influencing syntactic performance in EFL contexts. Pedagogically, the study suggests that expectations of sentence complexity should consider cognitive constraints and task conditions. Recognizing the role of working memory can lead to more realistic instruction, better task design, and fairer assessment of learner proficiency.
References
Baddeley, A. (2020). Working memory. Memory, 71-111.
Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (2013). The role of working memory in language comprehension. In Complex information processing (pp. 31-68). Psychology Press.
Izumi, S. (2003). Comprehension and production processes in second language learning: In search of the psycholinguistic rationale of the output hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 168-196.
Jiang, L., Abbuhl, R., & Fu, Y. (2025). Effects of working memory and task type on syntactic complexity in EFL learners’ writing. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 63(4), 2695-2715.
Levy, M. (2015). The role of qualitative approaches to research in CALL contexts: Closing in on the learner’s experience. CALICO journal, 32(3), 554-568.
Li, S., & Fu, M. (2018). Strategic and unpressured within-task planning and their associations with working memory. Language Teaching Research, 22(2), 230-253.
Meguerdichian, M., Walker, K., & Bajaj, K. (2016). Working memory is limited: improving knowledge transfer by optimising simulation through cognitive load theory. BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(4), 131.
Moustaghfir, S., & Ramila, A. (2025). SENTENCE COMPLEXITY IN EFL LEARNERS’WRITING: A SYNTACTIC ANALYSIS OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’COMPOSITIONS. European Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 8(3).
Wen, Z. (2012). Working memory and second language learning. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1-22.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Afzylianur Harahap, Alya Fadhillah Daimunthe, Putri Zahriah, Yani Lubis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












