Analysis of Qris Application as a Patented Computer Program Based on Patent Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56127/ijml.v5i1.2545Abstract
Discusses the analysis of the Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS) application as a computer program from the perspective of Law Number 13 of 2016 concerning Patents. This study aims to examine whether QRIS can be qualified as an object of patent protection or is included in the category excluded by patent law in Indonesia. The research method used is a normative juridical approach by examining the provisions of laws and regulations, legal doctrine, and the concept of intellectual property protection for computer programs. The results of the analysis show that QRIS is essentially a digital payment system and standard that emphasizes methods, protocols, and interoperability between payment service providers, so it does not meet the qualifications as a patentable technical invention. The computer program that is part of QRIS is more appropriate to obtain legal protection through the copyright regime or other protection mechanisms outside of patents. The conclusion of this study confirms that although QRIS has innovation value and significant contributions to the national payment system, patent protection for QRIS still has legal limitations based on the provisions of patent law in force in Indonesia.
References
Abdul Atsar, “Legal Protection of Inventions in the Field of Information and Communication Technology as an Effort to Improve Public Welfare in Indonesia,” 2020.
Melisa Safitri, Erlina, “Comparative Analysis Between Ordinary Patent Protection and Simple Patent Protection Based on Patent Law,” Jurnal Pranata Hukum, Vol.15, no. 1 (2020): p.30, https://doi.org/ 10.36448/pranatahukum.v15i1.216.
Muhammad Taufik Rusydi, “Legal Protection Against Computer Software Creators” Vol.3, no.2 September 2022.
Romi Faslah, Ichsanul Hikam, “The Important Role of IPR (Intellectual Property Rights): Patent Rights in the Era of Globalization,” Journal of Management Science and Education Vol.2, No. 1 (June 2025): 395–396.
Rr. Aline Gratika Nugrahani. “Problems of Reviving Patents That Have Been Deleted Based on Article 141 of Law Number 13 of 2016 Concerning Patents”, p. 75.
Rr.Aline Gratika Nugrahani, Anastasya Y, “Revival of Patent Number IDP000028054 Based on the Patent Law” Vol.1 (2024): p. 375.
Sutarman Yodo. Patent Rights Protection (Comparative Study of the Scope of Protection in Various Countries), Journal, Volume 10 Number 4, October-December 2016. p.711.
Yesi Yuli Nurcahyanti, Isnaini, “Implications of Patent and Copyright Protection for Software in Indonesia and Developed Countries” Vol.5 No. 1 (2016): p. 02.
Yunes Pebriadi, Ganda Yoga Swara, “Web-Based Cinema Ticket Reservation Software Engineering,” Jurnal Teknoif, Vol. 4 No. 2 (2016): p. 02.
Zahratunnisa, Dewi Qurotul Fatimah, “Protection and Settlement of Patent Rights Legal Disputes in Indonesia: Case Studies and Their Implications,” Jurnal Hukum Nusantara, Vol. 1, no. 13 (2025): 208–14.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jessicha

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.












