COPYRIGHT LAW AS COLLATERAL UNDER PAWN AND FIDUCIARY SCHEMES: A PERSPECTIVE BASED ON DSN-MUI FATWA NO. 25 OF 2002 ON RAHN AND DSN-MUI FATWA NO. 68 OF 2008 ON RAHN TASJILY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56127/jukim.v4i03.2062Keywords:
Copyright Law, Collateral, Fiduciary, Pawn, Rahn, Islamic Banking, DSN-MUI FatwaAbstract
Collateral is a fundamental requirement in credit transactions, both in conventional and Islamic banking and financial institutions. However, with the advancement of the times, it becomes necessary to examine the legal framework governing the use of copyright as collateral under a pawn scheme. Furthermore, how can copyright be utilized as collateral in credit transactions in accordance with both positive law and Islamic law? This study adopts a normative-empirical approach, analyzing regulations related to intellectual property rights—particularly copyright—and secured transactions such as Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright, Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 9 of 2007 on Bank Credit Collateral, and the DSN-MUI Fatwa No. 68 of 2008 on Rahn Tasjily. The findings of this study indicate that under the Copyright Law, copyright can indeed serve as collateral in credit transactions, but only through the fiduciary scheme. In practice, however, both conventional and Islamic banks have not yet fully implemented copyright-based collateral due to the absence of specific regulations that comprehensively govern such practices.
References
[1] A. Wangsawidjaja Z. (2012). Pembiayaan Bank Syariah. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
[2] Abdul Ghofur Anshory. (2008). Penerapan Prinsip Syariah dalam Lembaga Keuangan, Lembaga Pembiayaan dan Perusahaan Pembiayaan. Pustaka Pelajar.
[3] Abdul R. Saliman, Hermansyah, A. J. (2005). Hukum Bisnis untuk Perusahaan: Teori dan Contoh Kasus. Penerbit Prenada Media.
[4] Budi Agus Riswandi. (2005). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dan Budaya Hukum. Raja Grafindo.
[5] Gunawan Widjaja, A. Y. (2000). Jaminan Fidusia. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
[6] H.R. Daeng Naja. (2005). Hukum Kredit dan Bank Garansi (The Bankers Hand Book) (1st ed.). PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
[7] Iswi Hariyanti. (2010a). Hak Kekayaan Intelektual Sebagai Jaminan Kredit. Media HKI Ditjen HKI, Kemenkunham, VII.
[8] Iswi Hariyanti. (2010b). Prosedur Mengurus HAKI. Pustaka Yustisia.
[9] Iswi Hariyanti. (2010c). Restrukturisasi dan Penghapusan Kredit Macet. PT Elex Media Komputindo.
[10] Iswi, H. Y. C. (2015). Peran HKI dalam Pengembangan Waralaba dan Ekonomi Kreatif. Media HKI Ditjen HKI, Kemenkunham, XII.
[11] Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUH Perdata) 1838, 11 (2019).
[12] Muhamad Djumhana. (2000). Hukum Perbankan di Indonesia. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
[13] MUI, D. S. N. (2008). Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional NO: 68/DSN-MUI/III2008_Rahn Tasjily. 51, 3.
[14] MUI, D. S. N. (2016). Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional Nomor: 25/DSN-MUI/III/2002. Dewan Syariah Nasional MUI, 7(1), 3.
[15] Murti, S. D. I. A. (2010). Perjanjian Kredit dengan Jaminan Fidusia Atas Kendaraan Bermotor Yang Dijual Pada Pihak Ketiga Pada PT. Bank Danamon (Persero) Tbk Unit DSP Pracimantoro Wonogiri. Universitas Diponegoro.
[16] OK.Saidin. (2004). Aspek Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual. Raja Grafindo.
[17] Rachmadi Usman. (2009). Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan. Sinar Grafika.
[18] Salim.H.S. (2012). Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
[19] Sari, P. M. (2023). Problematika Valuasi Hak Cipta Sebagai Objek Jaminan Fidusia. 6(2), 5307–5320.
[20] Subekti. (1982). Jaminan-Jaminan untuk Pemberian Kredit Menurut Hukum Indonesia (10th ed.). PT. Alumni.
[21] Undang-Undang No 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia, Jdih 1 (1999).
[22] UU NO.17 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pelayaran, 61 (2008).
[23] UU No.21 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perbankan Syariah, المجلد 49 69 (2008). https://www.bertelsmann-stiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/MT_Globalization_Report_2018.pdf%0Ahttp://eprints.lse.ac.uk/43447/1/India_globalisation, society and inequalities(lsero).pdf%0Ahttps://www.quora.com/What-is-the
[24] UU No. 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta (2014).
