The Role Of The Macroprudential Intermediation Ratio And The Countercyclical Capital Buffer In Maintaining Indonesia’S Financial System Stability

Authors

  • Asa Puspa Nusantari Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Evina Verintina Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Dewi Mulyaningtyas Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Shandy Syah Putra Elyustomo Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56127/jukim.v5i01.2463

Keywords:

Financial System Stability, Macroprudential Policy, Macroprudential Intermediation Ratio (RIM), Countercyclical Capital Buffer (CCyB), Credit Growth, Systemic Risk, Indonesian Banking, Bank Indonesia, Financial Cycle.

Abstract

Financial system stability is a crucial element for the sustainability of the national economy. Imbalances in the financial sector, particularly those arising from credit growth that is not aligned with economic capacity, can lead to systemic risk. In response to these risks, Bank Indonesia has implemented macroprudential policies through instruments such as the Macroprudential Intermediation Ratio (RIM) and the Countercyclical Capital Buffer (CCyB). This study aims to analyze how RIM and CCyB contribute to maintaining financial system stability in Indonesia by utilizing national data from 2010 to 2024. Financial system stability is measured using the Non-Performing Loan (NPL) ratio in the banking sector. The analytical method employed is time series regression using the Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) approach, complemented by stationarity tests and classical assumption tests. The results indicate that RIM has a significant negative effect on NPL, while CCyB also exhibits a negative relationship, although with a lower level of significance. These findings suggest that synergy in macroprudential policies is essential to strengthen banking sector resilience and maintain the stability of Indonesia’s financial system.

References

[1]Anwar, C.J., Didu, S., Suhendra, I., Ichwanudin, W., & Nupus, H. (2025). Monetary Policy, Macroprudential Policy, and Credit Cycle: Evidence in the Indonesian Banking Industry . 15 (6).

[2]Arthasari, T. (2021). Effectiveness of monetary and macroprudential policy as a control of banking credit risk in Indonesia . 18 (3), 585–593.

[3]Ekonomika, J., Sosial, D., Ekonomi, F., Hasanuddin, U., Ekonomi, F., Hasanuddin, U., Ekonomi, F., Hasanuddin, U., & Korespondensi, E. (2025). Review of Indonesian Banking Performance on Financial System Stability Wienna Meidy Utami 1 , Anas Iswanto 2 , Mirzalina Zaenal 3 1 . 4 , 1–20.

[4]Gajah, KA, Lendu, KJ, & Gajah, A. (2018). MACROPRUDENTIAL POLICY ON BANKING SECTOR . 17 (1), 1–6.

[5]Instruments, P., Macroprudential, K., & Risk, T. (2024). INDEPENDENT : Journal Of Economics E-ISSN 2798-5008 . 4 , 88–97.

[6]Sistem, S., & Di, K. (2019). Analysis of the impact of the monetary and macroprudential policy mix on price stability and financial system stability in Indonesia . 2 (3), 31–52.

[7]Sriwijaya, U., Lama, B., Palembang, K., & Selatan, S. (2023). THE MACRO-PRUDENTIAL POLICY AND BANK NON-PERFORMING ASSETS IN INDONESIA . 11 (1), 42–50.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-20

How to Cite

Nusantari, A. P., Verintina, E., Mulyaningtyas, D., & Elyustomo, S. S. P. (2026). The Role Of The Macroprudential Intermediation Ratio And The Countercyclical Capital Buffer In Maintaining Indonesia’S Financial System Stability. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 5(01), 67–71. https://doi.org/10.56127/jukim.v5i01.2463

Citation Check

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.