Seismic Performance of SRC Column and Steel Beam Hybrid Frame Based on Pushover Method

Authors

  • Ayu Fatimah Sari Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • Yessi Widyasari Politeknik Negeri Malang
  • Nur Laily Lupita Sari Politeknik Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56127/juit.v4i3.2314

Keywords:

hybrid frame, nonlinear static analysis, pushover analysis, SRC column

Abstract

Hybrid structures combine different materials to achieve architectural and economic benefits. This study investigates the seismic performance of a steel–reinforced concrete (SRC) column and steel beam hybrid frame using the pushover method, a nonlinear static analysis approach. The structural analysis was conducted with the finite element program SAP2000 to evaluate the frame’s response to various loads, including seismic actions. A baseline model was developed as a reference, and key parameters such as beam-to-column stiffness ratio, and frame height were systematically varied to assess their influence on seismic performance. The results show that generally the hybrid frame demonstrates satisfactory resistance to seismic loads. Stiffness ratio parameter affect structural performance positively for model 1 to 5 but for model 6 to 9 the structure collapse first. While frame height parameter until 10 story height doesn’t significally impact the performance. These findings provide useful insights for optimizing the design of hybrid frames in seismic regions.

References

A, Kadid and A, B. (2009). Pushover analysis of steel steel-reinforced concrete frame. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 29(2), 51–56.

Chun, Y. S., & Hur, M. W. (2015). Effects of isolation period difference and beam-column stiffness ratio on the dynamic response of reinforced concrete buildings. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 9(4), 439–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-015-0120-9

FEMA 356. (2011). FEMA 356. In The 9/11 Encyclopedia: Volume 1-2, Second Edition (Vol. 1, Issue November). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544377230.n85

FEMA 440. (2005). Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. In Federal Emergency Management Agency (Issue June).

Feng, J. (2014). Study on the Seismic Performance of Steel Reinforced Concrete Column and Steel Beam Composite Frame.

Guangyong, W., & Dongming, Z. (2017). Experimental research on the post-fire seismic performance of steel reinforced concrete columns. Procedia Engineering, 210, 456–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.101

Jaiswal, O. R., & Jain, S. K. (2004). 13 th World conference on earthquake engineering. Indian Concrete Journal, 78(11), 74–76. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.38.1.41-49

Jiang, J., You, B., Hu, M., Hao, J., & Li, Y. (2008). Seismic design of a super high-rise hybrid structure. 14 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China SEISMIC, 05(2004), 22. ftp://ftp.ecn.purdue.edu/spujol/Andres/files/05-01-0560.PDF

Kuria, K. K., & Kegyes-Brassai, O. K. (2024). Pushover analysis in seismic engineering: A detailed chronology and review of techniques for structural assessment. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14010151

Lai, B. L., Yang, L., & Xiong, M. X. (2021). Numerical simulation and data-driven analysis on the flexural performance of steel reinforced concrete composite members. Engineering Structures, 247(August). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113200

Nieri, G., Hein, C., & Smith, S. (2023). Hybrid Structures in high-rise buildings: The use of appropriate materials. 13th World Conference on Timber Engineering, WCTE 2023, 2, 1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.52202/069179-0139

Sharma, A. (2022). Review paper pushover analysis-an overview. Journal of Engineering, Science and Mathematics, 1(2), 25–34. https://jesm.in/archives/

Sujani, S. N., Phanisha, K., Mohana Rupa, N., Sarkar, S., Nageswari, M., & Poluraju, P. (2012). Determination of performance level of G+5 building situated in zone III using pushover analysis by SAP2000. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications (IJERA), 2(2), 832–837. www.ijera.com

Tirca, L. and, & Tremblay, R. (2004). Influence of building height and ground motion type on the seismic behaviour of zipper concentrically braced steel frames. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2894, 1–15.

Yu, C. Q., Tong, J. Z., Zhou, S. M., Zhang, J. M., Shen, J. J., Zhang, L., Tong, G. S., Li, Q. H., & Xu, S. L. (2024). State-of-the-art review on steel-concrete composite walls. Sustainable Structures, 4(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.54113/j.sust.2024.000035

Downloads

Published

2025-10-08

How to Cite

Sari, A. F., Widyasari, Y., & Sari, N. L. L. (2025). Seismic Performance of SRC Column and Steel Beam Hybrid Frame Based on Pushover Method. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik, 4(3), 82–94. https://doi.org/10.56127/juit.v4i3.2314

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.