Comparative Analysis of Classical and Quantum-Inspired Optimization for Net-Zero Emission Power Grid Operation

Authors

  • Muh Zulfadli A Suyuti Institut Teknologi Bacharuddin Jusuf Habibie, Indonesia
  • Ansar Suyuti Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Said Universitas Khairun, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56127/juit.v5i1.2640

Keywords:

Power Grid Optimization, Energy Transition, Renewable Energy, Quantum-Inspired Optimization

Abstract

The transition toward net-zero-emission power grids has become increasingly challenging due to the growing penetration of renewable energy, the integration of energy storage, and the implementation of carbon-control policies. These developments increase the operational complexity of modern power systems and require optimization approaches capable of managing multiple technical and environmental constraints. Objective: This study aims to evaluate and compare the roles of classical optimization and quantum-inspired optimization in supporting the operation of low-carbon power grids under different energy-transition scenarios. Method: This research employed a quantitative approach using scenario-based modeling and simulation. The power-grid model integrated renewable energy sources, battery energy storage, and carbon-control mechanisms. Several transition scenarios were evaluated by varying renewable-energy targets, carbon prices, and emission caps. Comparative analysis was conducted using classical optimization based on Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) as the global optimum benchmark and quantum-inspired optimization based on simulated annealing as an alternative solution approach. Findings: The results show that classical optimization produces better solution quality and higher computational efficiency than the quantum-inspired approach. However, the quantum-inspired method is still able to generate feasible and stable solutions, particularly under scenarios with high renewable-energy penetration and strict emission constraints. Implications: These findings suggest that quantum-inspired optimization has practical potential as a complementary tool for supporting low-carbon power-grid operation and energy-transition planning, especially in increasingly complex systems. Originality: The novelty of this study lies in the direct comparison between classical and quantum-inspired optimization within a unified low-carbon power-grid simulation framework. The study provides added value by positioning quantum-inspired optimization as a complement, rather than a substitute, to classical optimization in net-zero-emission power-grid transition.

References

Ajagekar, A., & You, F. (2019). Quantum computing for energy systems optimization: Challenges and opportunities. Energy, 179, 76-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.04.186

Cholidis, D., Sifakis, N., Chachalis, A., Savvakis, N., & Arampatzis, G. (2025). Energy transition framework for nearly zero-energy ports: HRES planning, storage integration, and implementation roadmap. Sustainability, 17(13), 5971. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135971

Gill, S. S., & Buyya, R. (2026). Transforming research with quantum computing. Journal of Economy and Technology, 4, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ject.2024.07.001

Golestan, S., Habibi, M. R., Mousazadeh Mousavi, S. Y., Guerrero, J. M., & Vasquez, J. C. (2023). Quantum computation in power systems: An overview of recent advances. Energy Reports, 9, 584-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.185

Hassan, Q., Algburi, S., Sameen, A. Z., Salman, H. M., & Jaszczur, M. (2023). A review of hybrid renewable energy systems: Solar and wind-powered solutions, challenges, opportunities, and policy implications. Results in Engineering, 20, 101621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.101621

Hua, D., Chang, C., Liu, S., Liu, Y., Ma, D., & Hua, H. (2025). Quantum-inspired multi-objective optimization framework for dynamic wireless electric vehicle charging in highway networks under stochastic traffic and renewable energy variability. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 16(4), 221. https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj16040221

Jami, A. R., & Haleem, A. (2025). Quantum computing as an enabler for sustainable circular economy implementation in Industry 4.0: A study. Human Settlements and Sustainability, 1(2), 103-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hssust.2025.05.005

Kabeyi, M. J. B., & Olanrewaju, O. A. (2022). Sustainable energy transition for renewable and low carbon grid electricity generation and supply. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9, 743114. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.743114

Kurowski, K., Pecyna, T., Slysz, M., Różycki, R., Waligóra, G., & Wȩglarz, J. (2023). Application of quantum approximate optimization algorithm to job shop scheduling problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 310(2), 518-528.

Morstyn, T., & Wang, X. (2024). Opportunities for quantum computing within net-zero power system optimization. Joule, 8(6), 1619-1640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2024.03.020

Munawar, G., & Surendro, K. (2024). Utilizing quantum algorithms to achieve carbon neutrality in urban areas: A systematic review. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 108, 911-936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.09.043

Rahman, M. M., Dadon, S. H., He, M., Giesselmann, M., & Hasan, M. M. (2024). An overview of power system flexibility: High renewable energy penetration scenarios. Energies, 17(24), 6393. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17246393

Raseena, V. (2025). Quantum computing: foundations, algorithms, and emerging applications. Frontiers in Quantum Science and Technology, 4, 1723319.

Saleh, H. M., & Hassan, A. I. (2024). The challenges of sustainable energy transition: A focus on renewable energy. Applied Chemical Engineering, 7(2), 2084.

Tangpanitanon, J. (2025). Quantum computing for energy management: A semi-non-technical guide for practitioners. In AI and Digitalization in Energy Management (pp. 189-213). https://doi.org/10.1049/PBPO263E_ch11

Tian, X., An, C., & Chen, Z. (2023). The role of clean energy in achieving decarbonization of electricity generation, transportation, and heating sectors by 2050: A meta-analysis review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 182, 113404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113404

Ukoba, K., Olatunji, K. O., Adeoye, E., Jen, T. C., & Madyira, D. M. (2024). Optimizing renewable energy systems through artificial intelligence: Review and future prospects. Energy and Environment, 35(7), 3833-3879. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305X241256293

Ullah, M. H., Eskandarpour, R., Zheng, H., & Khodaei, A. (2022). Quantum computing for smart grid applications. IET Generation, Transmission and Distribution, 16(21), 4239-4257. https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.12602

Zhang, X., Ge, Y., & Patel, R. V. (2025). Renewable energy integration and energy efficiency enhancement for a net-zero-carbon commercial building. Buildings, 15(3), 414. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15030414

Downloads

Published

2026-03-12

How to Cite

Suyuti, M. Z. A., Suyuti, A., & Said, M. (2026). Comparative Analysis of Classical and Quantum-Inspired Optimization for Net-Zero Emission Power Grid Operation. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik, 5(1), 268–286. https://doi.org/10.56127/juit.v5i1.2640

Citation Check