Credit Analysis And Credit Risk In The Indonesian Banking Industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56127/jukim.v4i6.2401Keywords:
Bank; Credit; Credit Risk; and NPL.Abstract
This study analyzes banking credit performance and credit risk in Indonesia before, during, and after the Covid-19 pandemic. The research applies a descriptive analytical method using secondary data obtained from the Financial Services Authority (OJK), focusing on commercial banks. Before Covid-19, banking credit was in a stable condition, with normal lending and credit growth exceeding the growth of third-party funds (DPK). This indicates that banks were active in distributing credit supported by sufficient funding. When Covid-19 occurred, economic performance declined significantly, and credit distribution contracted. For three consecutive quarters, both economic growth and credit growth recorded negative figures as banks became more cautious due to shrinking business activities and rising uncertainty. In the post-pandemic period, spanning nine quarters up to Q4 2024, the banking sector showed strong recovery aligned with economic improvement. Credit growth increased sharply and was noticeably higher than DPK growth, demonstrating restored confidence and better financial intermediation capacity. Regarding credit risk, banks managed non-performing loans (NPL) effectively both before and after Covid-19, maintaining NPL ratios below the 5 percent regulatory threshold. During Covid-19, banks strengthened reserves through increased allowance for impairment losses (CKPN) to keep NPL stable, although this temporarily reduced profitability as reflected in lower return on assets (ROA). Overall, Indonesian banks showed resilience through prudent risk management.
References
[1]Abdurahman, H., & Ririh Riswaya, A. (2014). APLIKASI PINJAMAN PEMBAYARAN SECARA KREDIT PADA BANK YUDHA BHAKTI. Jurnal Computech & Bisnis, 8(2), 61–69.
[2]Ali, M. (1982). Penelitian Pendidikan, Prosedur dan Strategi Angkasa. Sinar Baru Algesindo.
[3]Ali, M. (2006). Manajemen Risiko (Strategi Perbankan danDunia Usaha Menghadapi Tantangan Globasisasi Bisnis). PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
[4]Ambarsita, L. (2013). Analisis penanganan kredit bermasalah. Manajemen Bisnis (Vol. 1).
[5]Anam, C. (2018). PENGARUH RISIKO KREDIT DANLIKUIDITAS TERHADAP KINERJAKEUANGAN PERBANKANPADA BANK UMUM KONVENSIONAL YANG TERDAFTAR DI BEI ( 2012-2016). MARGIN ECO : Jurnal Bisnis Dan Perkembangan Bisnis, 2(2).
[6]Astiko. (1996). Manajemen Perkreditan. Andi Offset.
[7]Fahmi, I. (2014). Manajemen Risiko. Alfabeta.
[8]Fitria, N., & Sari, R. L. (2012). ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN PEMBERIAN KREDIT DAN PENGARUH NON PERFORMING LOAN TERHADAP LOAN TO DEPOSIT RATIO PADA PT. BANK RAKYAT INDONESIA (PERSERO), TBK CABANG RANTAU, ACEH TAMIANG. ( PERIODE 2007-2011). Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan, 1(1), 88–101.
[9]Herdinigtyas, W., & Amalia, L. S. (2005). ANALISIS RASIO CAMEL TERHADAP PREDIKSI KONDISI BERMASALAH PADA LEMBAGA PERBANKAN PERIODA 2000-2002. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 7, 131–147.
[10]Idroes, F. N., & Sugiarto. (2006). Manajemen risiko perbankan : dalam konteks kesepakatan basel dan peraturan bank Indonesia (1st ed., Vol. 1). Graha Ilmu.
[11]Indriantoro, N., & Supomo, B. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis Untuk Akuntansi & Manajemen. BPFE.
[12]Rivai, V., Basir, S., Sudarto, S., &Veithzal, P. A. (2013). Commercial Bank Management Manajemen Perbankan dari Teori ke Praktek. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
[13](SE BINomor 12/ 11 /DPNP Tanggal 31 Maret 2010).
[14]Somantri, Y. F., & Sukmana, W. (2019). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Financing to Deposit Ratio (FDR) pada Bank Umum Syariah di Indonesia. Berkala Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 4(2), 147–153.
[15]Sudjana, N., & Ibrahim. (1989). Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Sinar Baru.
[16]Sugiyono. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian. Alfabeta.
[17]Undang – Undang Pokok Perbankan No. 7 Tahun 1992 .
