The Role of Attention and Memory in EFL Listening Comprehension: A Psycholinguistic Analysis

Authors

  • Cindy Alia Ramadhany Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Rosa Anjani Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Erna Fitriani Daulay Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Yani Lubis Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56127/jukim.v5i01.2514

Keywords:

EFL listening comprehension, attention, working memory, psycholinguistics, cognitive processing

Abstract

This study investigates the role of attention and memory in EFL listening comprehension from a psycholinguistic perspective. Listening comprehension requires rapid processing of spoken input under time pressure, which places heavy demands on learners’ cognitive resources. This research employed a quantitative correlational design involving undergraduate EFL learners. Data were collected using an attention task, a listening-based working memory task, and a standardized EFL listening comprehension test. Statistical analysis revealed significant positive relationships between attention, working memory, and listening comprehension. The results show that learners with stronger attentional control achieved better listening outcomes, while working memory emerged as the strongest predictor of listening performance. The findings also indicate a close interaction between attention and memory, suggesting that focused attention supports effective memory encoding during listening. These results confirm that listening difficulties are not solely caused by limited linguistic knowledge but also by cognitive constraints. The study contributes to psycholinguistic research by highlighting the importance of general cognitive mechanisms in second language listening. Pedagogically, the findings suggest that EFL listening instruction should consider cognitive load and learners’ processing capacity to support more effective comprehension.

References

[1]Bozorgian, H. (2012). The relationship between listening and other language skills in International English Language Testing System. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 657–663. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.4.657-663

[2]El Moussaoui, M., & Belhaj, A. (2025). Bottom-up listening skills: EFL teachers’ perceptions and classroom practices. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v9i2.5936

[3]Lestari, R. I. H., & Nugraha, S. I. (2023). EFL students’ challenges and strategies in speaking English. INNOVATIVE: Journal of Social Science Research, 3(4), 2142–2153. https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative

[4]Mekheimer, M. (2024). Working memory as a predictor of reading and listening comprehension in EFL college students: A reinvestigation. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 2076. https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v7n3.2076

[5]Nagaraj, N. K. (2021). Effect of auditory distraction on working memory, attention switching, and listening comprehension. Audiology Research, 11(2), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres11020021

[6]Nor, H., & Hizriani, N. (2025). Psycholinguistics: Language, mind, and brain and teaching methodology from psychology and linguistics perspectives. Antasari Press.

[7]Purba, N. (2018). The role of psycholinguistics in language learning and teaching. Tell: Teaching of English Language and Literature Journal, 6(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.30651/tell.v6i1.2077

[8]Sakai, H. (2018). Working memory in listening. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1–6). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0579

[9]Sultan, A., & Fatima, N. (2025). Attention modulation in reading: An analysis of cognitive dynamics through stories in English literature and linguistics. Lumina Literati Publishing. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14720209

Downloads

Published

2026-01-20

How to Cite

Ramadhany, C. A., Anjani, R., Daulay, E. F., & Lubis, Y. (2026). The Role of Attention and Memory in EFL Listening Comprehension: A Psycholinguistic Analysis. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 5(01), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.56127/jukim.v5i01.2514

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.