Comparative Study of Single Flash Steam–ORC and Back Pressure Steam–ORC Configurations in Geothermal Power System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56127/juit.v4i2.2028Keywords:
Organic Rankine Cycle, Single Flash Steam, Back Pressure, Geothermal EnergyAbstract
To support Indonesia's goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2060, optimizing the utilization of renewable energy sources is essential. In geothermal systems, brine—commonly considered waste—can be further harnessed to maximize resource efficiency and sustainability. The Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) presents a promising technology to significantly increase the power output and efficiency of geothermal power plants. This study aims to evaluate the turbine power output of two power generation system configurations integrated with ORC technology, using three different working fluids: Iso-pentane, R-290, and R-1234. The research method involves the development of mathematical and thermodynamic models to simulate and analyze energy conversion processes and calculate turbine power output in each configuration. The results show that the back pressure steam–ORC configuration generates substantially higher total power than the single flash steam–ORC system. Specifically, the back pressure system achieves 33.53 MW with Iso-pentane, 39.3 MW with R-290, and 47.6 MW with R-1234. The performance improvement is most significant when using R-1234, with a 19 MW increase compared to the single flash configuration. Meanwhile, the increase is only 1.46 MW for Iso-pentane and 0.8 MW for R-290. These findings highlight the superior efficiency of the back pressure steam–ORC configuration, particularly when paired with R-1234, as a promising solution for enhancing geothermal energy utilization in Indonesia.
References
Ahmad, A. H., Dermanto, P. S., & Juangsa, F. B. (2023). Thermodynamic and Economic Comparison of Organic Rankine Cycle and Kalina Cycle as Bottoming Unit to Utilize Exhaust Steam from Back Pressure Turbine Geothermal Power Plant. Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369202023
Assad, M. E. H., Aryanfar, Y., Radman, S., Yousef, B., & Pakatchian, M. (2021). Energy and exergy analyses of single flash geothermal power plant at optimum separator temperature. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 16(3), 873–881. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctab014
Chowdhury, A. S., & Ehsan, M. M. (2023). A Critical Overview of Working Fluids in Organic Rankine, Supercritical Rankine, and Supercritical Brayton Cycles Under Various Heat Grade Sources. International Journal of Thermofluids, 20, 100426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijft.2023.100426
Cornell, D. R., Deckers, M., Enomoto, Y., Funahashi, N., Haraguchi, M., Hecker, S., Kaliwoda, A., Kaneko, Y., Kanki, H., Kawashita, R., McBean, I., Nakata, T., Nishimura, K., Nomoto, H., Ohji, A., Ohta, M., Okita, N., Paulukuhn, L., Pennacchi, P., … White, A. J. (2022). Advances in Steam Turbines for Modern Power Plants (Second Edition). In Advances in Steam Turbines for Modern Power Plants (pp. xvii–xviii). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824359-6.00027-5
DiPippo, R. (2016). Geothermal Power Plants (4th ed.). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2014-0-02885-7
Fahlevi, O. (2023). Analisis Termodinamika Pemanfaatan Fluida Brine Panas Bumi Menggunakan Siklus Rankine Organik 125 kW. Jurnal Nasional Pengelolaan Energi MigasZoom, 5(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.37525/mz/2023-2/544
Jiménez-García, J. C., Ruiz, A., Pacheco-Reyes, A., & Rivera, W. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Organic Rankine Cycles. Processes, 11(7), 1982. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11071982
Melysa, R., Padilah, Y., Anwar, I., Wardianto, D., & Afdal, A. (2024). Analisis Potensi Listrik dengan Pemanfaatan Panas Limbah Brine dengan Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) di Sumur X Lapangan Panas Bumi Sorik Marapi. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Vokasi, 3(1), 35–41. https://doi.org/10.21063/jtv.2025.3.1.35-41
Moh Jaelani, K., Awliya, G., Brilian, V. A., Hosnan, R., & Siregar, L. R. (2022). Techno-Economic Analysis on the Development of an Add-On Geothermal Power Plant by Optimizing the Exhaust Back Pressure Turbine Steam in Ulumbu Field, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4054804
Nasruddin, Idrus Alhamid, M., Daud, Y., Surachman, A., Sugiyono, A., Aditya, H. B., & Mahlia, T. M. I. (2016). Potential of geothermal energy for electricity generation in Indonesia: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.032
Pambudi, N. A., & Ulfa, D. K. (2024). The geothermal energy landscape in Indonesia: A comprehensive 2023 update on power generation, policies, risks, phase and the role of education. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 189, 114008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114008
Prasetyo, B. T., Agustina, L., Suyanto, S., Guardi, A., Sutriyanto, H., Pujowidodo, H., Harmadi, R., Cahyadi, C., Ifanda, I., Anugia, Z., & Mustika, D. (2024). The integrative use of binary cycle technology to improve thermal efficiency and efficiency in geothermal power plants: A case study of Ulumbu geothermal power plant in Indonesia. Energy Conversion and Management, 321, 119033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119033
Sun, J., & Peng, B. (2025). Experimental study on steady-state operation of organic Rankine cycle system under different operating conditions. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 1041. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84813-2
Wang, H.-X., Lei, B., Wu, Y.-T., & Zhang, X.-M. (2024). Operational characteristics and performance optimizations of the organic Rankine cycle under different heat source/condensing environment conditions. Energy, 310, 133198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133198
Zinsalo, J. M., Lamarche, L., & Raymond, J. (2022). Performance analysis and working fluid selection of an Organic Rankine Cycle Power Plant coupled to an Enhanced Geothermal System. Energy, 245, 123259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123259
