A Critical Review of the Revision of Law Number 39 of 2008 on State Ministries from the Perspective of the Indonesian Rule of Law and the Principles of Pancasila Democracy

Authors

  • Daulat Nathanael Banjarnahor Universitas HKBP Nommensen Pematangsiantar
  • Rengga Kusuma Putra Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer
  • Firinta Togatorop Politeknik Bisnis Indonesia
  • David Banjarnahor Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56127/jukim.v4i04.2166

Keywords:

Revision, State Ministry, Rule of Law Indonesia, Pancasila Democracy

Abstract

As a country with a constitution as the highest fundamental law, Indonesia regulates and distributes state functions to state power organs, which are then referred to as State Institutions. One of the state institutions regulated in the constitution is the State Ministry Institution, which is governed by Article 17 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, stating that the President is assisted by State Ministers. Article 17 paragraph (4) regulates that the establishment, amendment, and dissolution of state ministries are governed by law. This then became a polemic, because the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) of the Republic of Indonesia had agreed to the Revision of Law Number 39 of 2008 on State Ministries, with one of the important points of change being the absence of a limit on the number of ministries, so that the number of ministries formed and established by the President is in accordance with the needs of state administration. The issues raised in this scientific article are: First, How to Critically Review and Analyze the Revision of Law Number 39 of 2008 on State Ministries from the Perspective or Doctrine of the Indonesian Rule of Law and the Principles of Pancasila Democracy, and Second, Whether the Revision of Law Number 39 of 2008 on State Ministries is in accordance with the Perspective or Doctrine of the Indonesian Rule of Law and the Principles of Pancasila Democracy. The research method used to address the issues in this scientific article is the normative legal research method with a conceptual approach. The conclusion drawn from the problem-solving answers is: First, that the Perspective or Doctrine of the Indonesian Rule of Law and the Principles of Pancasila were not used as guidelines and were ignored by the State in the process of Revising Law Number 39 of 2008 on State Ministries, and Second, that the Revision of Law Number 39 of 2008 on State Ministries does not yet align with the Perspective or Doctrine of the Indonesian Rule of Law and the Principles of Pancasila Democracy.

References

[1] Pasal 17 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

[2] Pasal 17 ayat (4) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

[3] Harbowo, N. (2024, September 9). RUU Kementerian Negara disepakati, Presiden bebas tambah dan pecah kementerian. Kompas.id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/polhuk/2024/09/09/baleg-dpr-dan-pemerintah-sepakati-ruu-kementerian-negara-presiden-bebas-tambah-dan-pecah-kementerian

[4] Yozami, M. A. (2024, September 10). Ini alasan revisi UU Kementerian Negara dibahas secara singkat. Hukumonline.com. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/ini-alasan-revisi-uu-kementerian-negara-dibahas-secara-singkat-lt66e052d1aae9e/?page=2

[5] Azhary, M. T. (2010). Negara hukum: Suatu studi tentang prinsip-prinsipnya dilihat dari segi hukum Islam, implementasinya pada periode Negara Madinah dan masa kini. Jakarta: Kencana.

[6] Mahfud, M. D. (2006). Membangun politik hukum menegakkan konstitusi. Jakarta: Pustaka LP3ES.

[7] Ali, M. (n.d.). Perbandingan konsep negara hukum. https://jdih.kkp.go.id/uploads/posts/892dc-perbandingan-konsep-negara-hukum-indonesia.pdf

[8] Pasal 2 Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2019 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan.

[9] Asshiddiqie, J. (2014). Konstitusi dan konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press.

[10] Hatta, M. (1998). Indonesia merdeka: Buku I, kebangsaan dan kerakyatan. Jakarta: LP3ES.

[11] Agustam. (2011). Konsepsi dan implementasi demokrasi Pancasila dalam sistem perpolitikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Tapis, 7(1), 82. https://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/TAPIs/article/download/1524/1263

[12] Susanti, D. O., & Efendi, A. (2015). Penelitian hukum (legal research). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

[13] Muhaimin. (2020). Metode penelitian hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press.

[14] Latif, Y. (2011). Negara paripurna: Historisitas, rasionalitas dan aktualitas Pancasila. Jakarta: Gramedia.

[15] Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. (n.d.). Proses dan teknik penyusunan undang-undang. https://www.emedia.dpr.go.id

[16] Mariam, S. (2014). Negara hukum: Prinsip dasar dan implementasinya di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

[17] Universitas Jayabaya. (n.d.). Hukum tata negara Indonesia: Teori dan penerapan. https://www.repo.jayabaya.ac.id

[18] Ming, B. (2012). Pengembangan sistem demokrasi Pancasila. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-03

How to Cite

Banjarnahor, D. N., Putra, R. K., Togatorop , F., & Banjarnahor, D. (2025). A Critical Review of the Revision of Law Number 39 of 2008 on State Ministries from the Perspective of the Indonesian Rule of Law and the Principles of Pancasila Democracy. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 4(04), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.56127/jukim.v4i04.2166

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.