Teachers’ Perspectives on Repetition as a Cognitive Strategy in Teaching English Vocabulary to Junior High School Students

Authors

  • Yani Lubis Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Nadila Adelia Putri Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Najla Regar Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Juanda Muktar Hasibuan Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56127/jukim.v5i01.2508

Keywords:

repetition, cognitive strategy, vocabulary teaching, teachers’ perspective, psycholinguistics

Abstract

This study explores English teachers’ perspectives on the use of repetition as a cognitive strategy in teaching vocabulary to junior high school students. Employing a qualitative descriptive design, data were collected through six in-depth interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis involving two experienced English teachers from a junior high school in Helvetia, North Sumatra. The novelty of this research lies in highlighting teachers’ viewpoints as the central lens for understanding how repetition functions cognitively and pedagogically in EFL classrooms. The findings reveal that teachers perceive repetition as a meaningful process that reinforces students’ memory and facilitates vocabulary retention through contextual and varied practice. Despite challenges in maintaining engagement, repetition was viewed as an effective and adaptable strategy that bridges psycholinguistic theory and classroom application. The study contributes to a deeper understanding of how cognitive principles can inform vocabulary teaching practices in EFL contexts.

References

[1]Ahmadvand, M., & Nejadansari, D. (2014). Attention to Meaning and Form vs. Attention to Meaning Alone: The Effect of Focus on Form on Vocabulary Retention in an EFL Context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98(1990), 116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.396

[2]Alnan, A., & Halim, H. A. (2024). Examining vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary size among Syrian EFL learners. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v14i1.70356

[3]Asyiah, D. N. (2017). the Vocabulary Teaching and Vocabulary Learning: Perception, Strategies, and Influences on Students’ Vocabulary Mastery. Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia, 9(2), 293–318. https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2017.9.2.133-158

[4]Badriyatin. F, E., Supriyono, & Aini, M. R. (2022). Integrated Flashcard and Ludo Vocabulary Learning Game To Increase Vocabulary Achievement of the First Grade of Junior High School: Research and Development. JARES (Journal of Academic Research and Sciences), 7(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.35457/jares.v7i1.1856

[5]Bawawa, M. (2020). Teaching English Vocabulary Using Songs To Developing Students’ Vocabulary Mastery. Kajian Linguistik, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.35796/kaling.8.1.2020.29099

[6]Bepari, N. G., & Imam, A. (2025). Enhancing English Language Skills Through Fun-Focused Teaching: An Action Research in Bangladeshi Classrooms. Journal of Creative Writing, 9(1), 79–93.

[7]Dewi, L. A. R. (2010). The Effects of Total Physical Response-Story Telling to Teach Vocabulary to Improve Elementary Students’ Vocabulary Achievement. Magister Scientiae, 28, 149–160.

[8]Lyu, Y. (2025). International Journal of Educational Research Open Teacher research self-efficacy and teacher research environment in higher education : University teachers ’ perceptions from a social cognitive perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 9(October), 100543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100543

[9]Maharani, Y. D. B., Rofi’ah, S., & Saifudin, A. (2023). Development of vocabulary card in learning english vocabulary for 7th grade students at MTs Ma’arif Gandusari. Patria Eduacational Journal (PEJ), 3(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.28926/pej.v3i1.851

[10]Mehmood, M. U. (2025). Psychological Impact of Languages on The Human Mind: Research on The Contribution of Psycholinguistics Approach to Teaching and Learning English. Journa of Applied Linguistics and TESOL, 8(3), 1160–1174. https://doi.org/10.63878/jalt1089

[11]Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press, 1–624.

[12]Pezzulo, G. (2007). Working Memory. Institute of Cognitive Science and Technology, 1–4.

[13]Rustamana, A., Adillah, M. P., Maharani, N. K., & Fayyedh, F. A. (2024). Qualitative Research Methods. Indonesian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Science and Technology (Marcopolo), 2(6), 1–7. https://doi.org/: https://doi.org/10.55927/marcopolo.v2i6.9907

[14]Steinberg, D. D., & Sciarini, N. V. (2006). An Introduction to Psycholinguistics 2nd Edition. In Rouledge (Taylor & Francis Group).

[15]Suryati, N. (2025). EFL S tudents ’ Perception towards the Use of Debate Video Session for Vocabulary Acquisition and Retention. 16(2), 380–396.

[16]Ugwu, Chinyere. N. and Eze Val, H. U. (2023). International Digital Organization for Scientific Research Qualitative Research. International Digital Organization for Scientific Research IDOSR JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND APPLIED SCIENCES, 8(1-January), 209.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-19

How to Cite

Lubis, Y. ., Putri, N. A., Regar, N., & Hasibuan, J. M. (2026). Teachers’ Perspectives on Repetition as a Cognitive Strategy in Teaching English Vocabulary to Junior High School Students. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 5(01), 61–66. https://doi.org/10.56127/jukim.v5i01.2508

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.