STRATEGIC OVERTIME IMPLEMENTATION: ASSESSING CRASH TIME, CRASH COST, AND COST SLOPE IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF KADIRI UNIVERSITY'S 4-STORY BUILDING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56127/ijst.v3i2.1309Keywords:
Project Delays, Crashing, Overtime, Project management.Abstract
The lecture building is an important building which is the center of academic activities where educational activities are carried out. Currently, the construction of a four-story lecture building at Kadiri University is experiencing significant project delays with a deviation of 5.64% from the plan. Crash analysis can be carried out to speed up the duration of the project so that it can be completed on time with additional working hours. This research aims to determine crash time, crash costs, and cost slope for the application of overtime on the 4-story building construction project at Kadiri University. A quantitative and case study approach was used with data collected through observation, interviews, and analysis of project documents. Critical Path Method (CPM) analysis is carried out using Microsoft Project software to identify work that is on the critical path. Crashing is done by calculating crash time, crash cost, and cost slope. The research results show that applying 1 hour of overtime can speed up the project by 12 working days, with an additional cost of IDR 24,488,758. Cost slope analysis shows additional overtime costs of IDR 12,244,379. This research shows that the application of measurable overtime and crashing analysis can effectively overcome project delays in the context of building educational facilities.
References
D. Huldiansyah, T. R. Dewi, and N. A. Jordan, “Rancangan Lansekap Gedung Kuliah E Kampus Institut Teknologi Kalimantan Sebagai Ruang Multi Fungsi,” JAUR (JOURNAL Archit. Urban. Res., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 20–31, 2022.
K. B. Scorita and F. Handayani, “Penerapan Mix Marketing Pada Perguruan Tinggi,” Kinerja, vol. 4, no. 01, pp. 67–77, 2021.
M. R. Prayoga, A. Purnomo, and A. Saefudin, “Analisis dan Optimasi Pengelolaan Waktu Pengecoran Struktur Beton pada Proyek Konstruksi: Studi Kasus Keterlambatan Pengecoran Kolom, Balok, dan Plat,” J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 350–358, 2024.
A. Muharani, I. P. Mulyatno, and S. J. Sisworo, “Optimasi Percepatan Proyek Pembangunan Kapal Kelas I Kenavigasian dengan Metode Pendekatan Analisa Time Cost Trade Off,” J. Tek. Perkapalan, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 330–338, 2020.
N. Nurazizah, F. Firdasari, and M. Purwandito, “Penerapan Metode Time-Cost Trade-Off dalam Optimalisasi Biaya dan Jadwal Proyek Laboratorium Dasar Universitas Samudra,” J. Ilm. Telsinas Elektro, Sipil dan Tek. Inf., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 94–103, 2023.
D. Fardila and N. R. Adawyah, “Optimasi Biaya dan Waktu Proyek Konstruksi dengan Lembur dan Penambahan Tenaga Kerja,” INERSIA lnformasi dan Ekspose Has. Ris. Tek. Sipil dan Arsit., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 35–46, 2021.
A. Gunawan and A. Setyawan, “Analisis Produktivitas Hasil Pekerjaan Konstruksi Antara Kerja Normal dan Kerja Lembur,” Surakarta Civ. Eng. Rev., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 49–61, 2022.
J. Jeunet and M. B. Orm, “Optimizing temporary work and overtime in the Time Cost Quality Trade-off Problem,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 284, no. 2, pp. 743–761, 2020.
R. Ansari, S. A. Banihashemi, R. Taherkhani, and S. Moradi, “Decision support system for analyzing key performance indicators in construction projects management,” Int. J. Eng., vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 865–874, 2022.
P. F. Dewi and Z. R. Kamandang, “Optimizing Project Performance by Applying the Crashing Method to Road Construction Project,” Adv. Sustain. Sci. Eng. Technol., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 230203, 2023.
R. Rosalinda, N. Nizmah, S. Ari R, M. Makmur, and D. Rarasanti, “Analysis Of Project Time And Cost Control With Cpm, Pert And Crashing Project Methods In Shop Building Projects At Cv. Mentari Permai,” Sci. J. Reflect. Econ. Accounting, Manag. Bus., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 85–94, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.37481/sjr.v6i1.622.
A. Andiyan, R. M. Putra, G. D. Rembulan, and H. Tannady, “Construction Project Evaluation Using CPM-Crashing, CPM-PERT and CCPM for Minimize Project Delays,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1933, no. 1, p. 012096, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1933/1/012096.
N. Sa’adah, E. Iqrammah, and T. Rijanto, “Evaluasi Proyek Pembangunan Gedung Stroke Center (Paviliun Flamboyan) Menggunakan Metode Critical Path Method (CPM) Dan Crashing,” Publ. Ris. Orientasi Tek. Sipil, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 55–62, 2022, doi: 10.26740/proteksi.v3n2.p55-62.
D. Irawan, A. L. Nurdin, A. Khamid, and Y. Feriska, “Model Analisis Pelaksanaan Proyek dengan Metode Critical Path Method (CPM) dan Metode Crashing (Study Kasus pada Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Peningkatan Jalan Kebandingan – Gembongdadi , Kecamatan Kramat , Kabupaten Tegal) Project Implementation Analysis Mo,” Infratech Build. J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 96–102, 2020.
M. B. Firdaus, H. T. Tjendani, and B. Witjaksana, “Acceleration Analysis Using the Crashing Method in the Sdn Kutisari 2 Development Project,” Int. J. Adv. Technol. Eng. Inf. Syst., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 366–375, 2024, doi: 10.55047/ijateis.v2i4.950.
B. Setiawan and Ridwan Usman, “Optimalisasi Penjadwalan Proyek Dengan Menggunakan Metode CPM Di Proyek LRT Pulomas,” JENIUS J. Terap. Tek. Ind., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 77–87, 2020, doi: 10.37373/jenius.v1i2.52.
