COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS IN A CASE STUDY OF THE BEST EMPLOYEE DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS

Authors

  • Syalis Ibnih Melati Istini Gunadarma University
  • Ahmad Apandi Gunadarma University
  • Rama Dian Syah Gunadarma University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56127/ijst.v3i2.1581

Keywords:

Decision Support System, AHP, Topsis, SAW, MCDM

Abstract

Selecting the best employees is an alternative for companies to maintain and improve the quality of employee work. Being best employee is a matter of pride for every employee, so this good thing will also have an impact on the company. Having employees with good quality will certainly improve the quality of the company itself. Making decisions for the best employees is a challenge for companies because its subjective nature makes the selection inaccurate, so an objective decision-making system is needed according to the criteria. The purpose of this study is to compare three multi-criteria decision-making methods (MCDM) namely AHP (Analysis Hierarchy Process), SAW (Simple Additive Weighting Model) and TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution). Based on comparative studies from several journals, the results of the accuracy levels obtained from different methods show that there are different results from several cases discussed in reference journals, this is due to differences in the number of criteria and alternatives used for analysis.

References

Turban et al., Decision Support System and Intelligent Systems (Sistem Pendukung Keputusan dan Sistem Cerdas) Jilid I Edisi 7. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2005

Kusrini, Konsep dan Aplikasi SistemPendukung Keputusan, Yogyakarta: Andi, 2005

I. Zakiyah, G. Abdillah, dan A. Komarudin, “Sistem Pendukung Kepututsan Balita Sehat Menggunakan Metode AHP dan TOPSIS,” Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi 2019 Sentika, p. 122, Yogyakarta, 13-14 Maret 2019.

Imron, “Penerapan Metode AHP pada Penentuan Sales Terbaik Studi Kasus: PT. Sampoerna Telekomunikasi Indonesia,” Jurnal Teknik Komputer, vol 5, no 1, p. 127-134, Februari 2019.

Rima Melatie Munthe, Anita Rita Sindar, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Karyawan Terbaik Dengan Metode AHP”, JISKa, Vol. 3, No. 2, Pp. 119-125, September, 2018

S. Gayatri, and S. Chetan, “Comparative Study of Different Multi-Criteria Decision-making Methods,” International Journal on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (IJACTE), vol 2, no.2, 2013.

L. Za, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Terbaik Per Triwulan PT. Cahaya Fajar Kaltim PLTU Embalut Tanjunt Batu Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” Prosiding Seminar Ilmu Komputer dan Teknologi Informasi, vol. 1, no. 1, September 2016.

Hamid dan D. M. Midyanti, “Penerapan Metode Topsis dalam Penentuan Skala Prioritas Rehabilitasi Jaringan Irigasi Daerah Ketiat B Bengkayang,” Jurnal Simetris, vol 10, no 10, p. 296, April 2019.

A. Aqham dan Febryantahanuji, “Metode Topsis dalam Penilaian Kinerja Karyawan pada Sekolah Alam Auliya Kendal,” Jurnal Nusamba, vol 4, no. 1, p. 60-74, April 2019.

M.M.D. Widianta, T. Rizaldi, D.P.S Setyohadi, and H Y Risiawan, “Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Support Methods (AHP, TOPSIS, SAW & PROMENTHEE) for Employee Placement,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol 953, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-30

How to Cite

Istini, S. I. M., Ahmad Apandi, & Rama Dian Syah. (2024). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MULTI CRITERIA DECISION MAKING METHODS IN A CASE STUDY OF THE BEST EMPLOYEE DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS. International Journal Science and Technology, 3(2), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.56127/ijst.v3i2.1581

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.